insuranceneeds.in

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 2 December 2009

Securities Law - Trading On Inside Information - The Penalty

Posted on 07:48 by Unknown
The SEC sued Khaled Al Hashemi, a citizen of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emigrates and a current technology manager at an Abu Dhabi oil refinery, charging that he engaged in unlawful trading on the basis of material non-public information concerning the acquisition of Nova Chemicals Corp. by International Petroleum Investment Co.

The case was filed in the Federal Court for the Southern District of New York, Civil Action no. 09-CIV-6650, on November 19, 2009.

The SEC alleged that Al Hashemi purchased approximately 120,000 shares of Nova at an average price of $1.41 per share shortly before a merger was announced and then sold those shares on the day the merger was announced. The price per share of the sale was $5.24, realizing a profit for Al Hashemi of $458,760. It is interesting to note that he purchased 50% of his Nova stock on the last trading day before the announcement of the acquisition by International.

Nova headquartered in Canada, with an office in Pennsylvania, produces plastics and chemicals. The Nova stock was registered with the SEC pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act and is traded on the New York Stock Exchange.

International made a cash offer to acquire Nova for $6.00 per share. On the day following the announcement the stock of Nova increased to $5.21 per share, or a 289% increase with a substantially greater volume on the New York Stock Exchange.
Al Hashemi’s sold his entire 120,000 shares of Nova and received a return of 270%, equal to a profit of $458,000.

The SEC in its Complaint alleged that the sale by Al Hashemi of his other securities in order to find sufficient funds to purchase the Nova stock strongly suggested that he knew that the Nova common stock would rise on the news of the prospective purchase. It is further interesting to note that Al Hashemi incurred a loss of 66% on his other investments when he liquidated them (presumably to raise cash for the Nova stock purchase). The SEC alleged that Al Hashemi traded on the basis of material inside information that he misappropriated in violation of his fiduciary duty or similar duty of trust and confidence to the shareholders of Nova, or, to the source of whom he received such inside information.

Specifically, the SEC alleged that Al Hashemi employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud, made untrue statements of material facts, or engaged in acts to operate as a fraud or deceit in connection with the purchase or sale of a security. Moreover, the SEC alleged that Al Hashemi violated a Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The SEC prayed for a permanent injunction to prevent him from violating Section 10(b) and to order Al Hashemi to disgorge unlawful trading profits and to pay a civil penalty pursuant to the Exchange Act.

Al Hashemi did not admit or deny wrongdoing, but did agree to the injunction and the penalties, including disgorgement of $558,760, $9,620 in pre-judgment interest, and a $406,620 civil penalty.

The SEC typically notices unusual trading volume shortly before the announcement of a cash offer for stock or a merger.

Edward X. Clinton, Sr.
Copyright 2009
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in Securities Law | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Corporate Law - LLC Statute Shields Member From Personal Liability
    Carollo v. Irwin, Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 4th Div. 2011 - Google Scholar : The Illinois Appellate Court recently decided the above-...
  • Shareholder Derivative Action Dismissed Because Plaintiff Failed To Make A Demand on the Board of Directors
    IN RE HURON CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v. HURON CONSULTING GROUP, INC., Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 2nd Div. 2012 - Google Scholar : This c...
  • Contract Law - Lewitton v. ITA Software, Incorporated (Seventh Circuit 08-3725)
    The Seventh Circuit Holds that An Employer Breached An Employment Contract When It Blocked A Former Employee From Exercising Options To Purc...
  • LLC Operating Agreement Defeats Unjust Enrichment and Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims
    WOSS, LLC v. 218 ECKFORD, LLC, 102 AD 3d 860 - NY: Appellate Div., 2nd Dept. 2013 - Google Scholar : The plaintiff LLC was a member of the d...
  • Fraud and Proof of Reliance
    In fraud cases, the plaintiff must prove, among other things, that she reasonably relied on the factual assertion made by the defendant. All...
  • Seventh Circuit Weighs In On Unjust Enrichment Debate
    Cleary v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 2011 - Google Scholar : The Seventh Circuit recently affirmed the dismis...
  • Appellate Court Upholds Personal Guarantee
    YELLOW BOOK SALES AND DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, INC. v. Feldman, Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 4th Div. 2012 - Google Scholar : This case, w...
  • Seventh Circuit Approves Securities Class Certification in Conseco Case
    The United States District Court for the Seventh District of Indiana approved class certification for a class of Conseco Investors. (Later C...
  • A Brief Review of Insider Trading Law - Rule 10b-5
    Insider trading law is highly complex. This is a brief summary of the law. Rule 10b-5 1. Insider Trading 15 U.S.C. §78j(b) provides that it...
  • Corporate Law - Dissolved Corporation Lacks Standing To Sue For Claims Arising After Dissolution
    Sometimes a client asks whether a dissolved corporation can bring a lawsuit. The answer is not clear. If the claim accrued before the corpor...

Categories

  • Business Advice
  • Collection Law
  • Consumer Rights
  • Contract Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Creditor Rights
  • Federal Arbitration Act
  • Federal Rules of Evidence
  • Fraud Claims
  • Fraudulent Transfer
  • Insurance Coverage Disputes
  • Internet Collection Scam
  • Limited Liability Company Issues
  • Litigation Issues
  • Moorman Doctrine
  • Mortgage Foreclosure
  • Noncompetition Agreements
  • Personal Jurisdiction
  • Securities Law
  • Shareholder Derivative Actions
  • Too Many Lawyers and Too Many Law Students
  • Uniform Commercial Code

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (27)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2012 (34)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (40)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2010 (36)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ▼  2009 (18)
    • ▼  December (3)
      • Fraudulent Transfer - Munson v. Rinke, 1-08-2998, ...
      • Securities Law - SEC Acts On Proxy Voting Proposal
      • Securities Law - Trading On Inside Information - T...
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (4)
  • ►  2008 (1)
    • ►  September (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile