insuranceneeds.in

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

Securities Law - Illinois Securities Law

Posted on 14:55 by Unknown
There has been much attention recently to the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The actions and prosecution of Bernard Madoff increased interest.

The Illinois Securities Law (the “Act”) 815 ILCS 5, also merits attention because it is sometimes overlooked.

The Act is administered by the Secretary of State. It provides for remedies and attorneys’ fees for violations of the Act. Violations are set forth in Section 12 of the Act and remedies are described in Section 13. Section 13 also has to be followed carefully because it sets forth the procedures to pursue a remedy.
Section 12 provides generally that it is a violation of the Act to offer or sell a security except in accordance with the provisions of the Act. Violations include: (1) failure to deliver to a purchaser any security required to be registered without accompanying that security with a prospectus that meets the registration provisions; (2) failure to act as a dealer, sales person or investment advisor unless properly registered; (3) filing any document that is false or misleading, with respect to material fact, (4) engaging in any transaction which works or intends to work a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser or seller of a security; and (5) obtaining money through the sales of a security by means of an untrue statement of a material fact.
Section 13 of the Act provides that every sale in violation of the Act is voidable at the election of the purchaser. Persons who are liable are the insurer, controlling persons, underwriters, dealers or other persons who shall have participated or aided in the sale. Damages include the amount paid with interest from the date of payment. There must be a tender to the seller or tender to the Court of the securities sold. It the purchase prevails then the Court shall assess costs together with reasonable fees and expenses of the purchaser’s attorney.

There is a dual statute of limitations. First of all, a notice of election to rescind must be given within six months after the purchaser has knowledge that the sale is voidable. Notice is given served by registered or certified mail.

There is a three-year statue of limitations from the date of sale provided that if the person who brings the action knew or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known the violation. The three year period begins to run upon the earlier of (1) the date the person has actual knowledge, or (2) the date upon which the person bringing the action has notice of facts which in the exercise of reasonable diligence would lead to actual knowledge. The period is not extended in any event more than two years.

The Court also has the power on application by the Secretary of State when it learns that a person has engaged or is about to engaged in a violation to grant an injunction and if the proposed sale is determined to be unlawful the Court may assess costs against the defendant.

Therefore, although it is not widely understood, the Illinois Securities Law does provide several remedies including attorneys’ fees.

The Illinois Securities Law of 1953 was drafted by Samuel H. Young, former Republican Congressman for the Tenth Congressional District while he was acting as First Assistant Secretary of State. The Act of 1953 provided comprehensive investor protection including detailed provisions before securities could be offered or sold in Illinois.

During the reign of Jim Edgar as governor, the law was revised to remove many of the investor safeguards, particularly, in the area of the registration of securities. Mr. Young traveled to Springfield, Illinois at his own expense to testify before a House Committee to oppose the Edgar Amendments to the Illinois Securities Law. Unfortunately, he was not successful.

Edward X. Clinton, Sr.
Copyright 2010
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in Securities Law | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Corporate Law - LLC Statute Shields Member From Personal Liability
    Carollo v. Irwin, Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 4th Div. 2011 - Google Scholar : The Illinois Appellate Court recently decided the above-...
  • Seventh Circuit Approves Securities Class Certification in Conseco Case
    The United States District Court for the Seventh District of Indiana approved class certification for a class of Conseco Investors. (Later C...
  • LLC Operating Agreement Defeats Unjust Enrichment and Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims
    WOSS, LLC v. 218 ECKFORD, LLC, 102 AD 3d 860 - NY: Appellate Div., 2nd Dept. 2013 - Google Scholar : The plaintiff LLC was a member of the d...
  • Seventh Circuit Weighs In On Unjust Enrichment Debate
    Cleary v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 2011 - Google Scholar : The Seventh Circuit recently affirmed the dismis...
  • Contract Law - Lewitton v. ITA Software, Incorporated (Seventh Circuit 08-3725)
    The Seventh Circuit Holds that An Employer Breached An Employment Contract When It Blocked A Former Employee From Exercising Options To Purc...
  • Securities Law - Wells Notice
    A Wells Notice advises a public company or a principal officer of a public company that the Securities & Exchange Commission is consider...
  • Fraud and Proof of Reliance
    In fraud cases, the plaintiff must prove, among other things, that she reasonably relied on the factual assertion made by the defendant. All...
  • District Court Holds That Moorman Doctrine Bars A Conversion Claim
    Lansing v. Carroll, Dist. Court, ND Illinois 2012 - Google Scholar : The economic loss or Moorman doctrine bars tort claims where the damage...
  • Business Debts - The Bankruptcy Court Will Not Discharge A Debt Where The Underlying Loan Was Procured Through Fraud
    In Ojeda v. Goldberg , No. 09-2008, the Seventh Circuit affirmed a determination of the District Court (Judge Gottschall) that a debt was no...
  • Shareholder Derivative Action Dismissed Because Plaintiff Failed To Make A Demand on the Board of Directors
    IN RE HURON CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v. HURON CONSULTING GROUP, INC., Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 2nd Div. 2012 - Google Scholar : This c...

Categories

  • Business Advice
  • Collection Law
  • Consumer Rights
  • Contract Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Creditor Rights
  • Federal Arbitration Act
  • Federal Rules of Evidence
  • Fraud Claims
  • Fraudulent Transfer
  • Insurance Coverage Disputes
  • Internet Collection Scam
  • Limited Liability Company Issues
  • Litigation Issues
  • Moorman Doctrine
  • Mortgage Foreclosure
  • Noncompetition Agreements
  • Personal Jurisdiction
  • Securities Law
  • Shareholder Derivative Actions
  • Too Many Lawyers and Too Many Law Students
  • Uniform Commercial Code

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (27)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2012 (34)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (40)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ▼  2010 (36)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ▼  March (4)
      • Securities Law - Illinois Securities Law
      • Securities Law - Section 10b-5 Insider Trading
      • Securities Law - Section 10b-5 and Investment Comp...
      • Securities Law - Illinois Securities Law
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2009 (18)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (4)
  • ►  2008 (1)
    • ►  September (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile